In what has been a hotly contested debate over whether the male human species is innately smarter than the female human species, there seems to be evidence that may disappoint some feminists in their conclusions. 

Research has somewhat concluded that theory that men may be smarter than women (not by much mind you, but statistically smarter by a narrow margin) by a hair, as studies of more than 100,000 SAT scores indicate. 

Keep in mind, these are studies that are measurable because they are of a pre-existing test score, and that they are only for the narrow age margin of 17-18 year old males who are getting ready to go to college and have high stakes to succeed in the SAT scores to get into college. 

Nonetheless, women of that age still have those high stakes, so evidence may point to the fact that the age old gender intelligence debate may have some spark left in it. 

This was all done in answer to tests that were performed in Denmark and Britain which gave men a 5-10 point IQ point lead over women test subjects when tested for general intelligence. 

Typically, past test results have indicated basically that men may be better at math and map reading, and women may be better in verbal utilization, or language, writing and reading skills. 

These new findings kind of blow those ones out of the water because they are more conclusive as to a general consensus that men may have an overal slight IQ point advantage over their female counterparts.